8.2

pretty bad
Typical Repair Cost:
$1,130
Average Mileage:
60,600 miles
Total Complaints:
23 complaints

Most common solutions:

  1. replace tail light (18 reports)
  2. not sure (4 reports)
  3. no (1 reports)
Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2014 Dodge Durango:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

This problem may be covered under warranty. Ask your Dodge dealer.

« Read the previous 20 complaints

problem #3

Jul 142018

Durango Citadel 3.6L

  • Automatic transmission
  • 50,644 miles

Condensation and water starting to gather on the left side of the rear racetrack lighting on my 2014 Dodge Durango. Would a replacement be covered under the 5 year factory warranty?

Update from Feb 13, 2021: Water still pouring into the light when it rains. Why can't the dealer contact us to bring the vehicle to them and take out the light and Re-seal the taillight to stop the water from coming in with a clear silicone or epoxy and the vehicles where the lights have shorted out already, the dealer should replace the taillight. I would do that myself but I was told by my Dealer that if I did that and Dodge decides to do a recall, seeing that I tried to fix it , then Dodge wouldn't honor my recall . 02/13/2021

- Glenn S., Shelton, Ct., US

problem #2

Sep 012016

Durango Limited 3.2L V6

  • Automatic transmission
  • 123,000 miles

The cost of replacing the tail light is relatively expensive, over $1000. I don't know how the water is getting in. Every time it rains I have to take a screw out and drain the water. Then my headlights and bright lights went out during a rain storm. The GPS works when it wants to. The dealer just gave me a website and a phone number to call about it.

- lisom, Elizabethtown, US

problem #1

Nov 102017

Durango Limited 3.6lV6

  • Automatic transmission
  • 47,000 miles

$1,200 to fix @ dealer. Way to much to fix a tail light. Living on social security and can't fix. I like car otherwise. Thought tail light problems were solved at least 80 years ago. Isn't this a safety issue for the feds? I've heard of others with this same problem.

- Roger B., Murfreesboro, TN, US