10.0

really awful
Crashes / Fires:
1 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
78,383 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

The NHTSA is the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints can be spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem. See the Back button — blue bar at the very top of the page — to explore more.

Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 1997 Ford Taurus:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

problem #10

Aug 172011

Taurus

  • 54,500 miles
I heard rattling in the front of the vehicle towards the wheels of the car. I assumed that it was my brakes needing replaced. I took it in for regular maintenance to have the brakes replaced at which time they did a diagnostic on the brakes, they were still good and found that my automatic braking system had failed (hydraulics that actually push the brake pads down), thankfully I was not on the highway going 55mph like I usually do when this happened. Ford needs to recall the entire braking system of the Ford Taurus gl station wagon according to all the complaints that I have seen also keeping in mind most of the complaints were over 100,000 miles. Someone will be killed due to this failure. God forbid there might be children in the vehicle when it happens. Ford step up to the plate and fix this problem now!! it is going to cost me $2100 to have the pump and hydraulic system replaced and this is not an exaggeration. I depend on this vehicle and can not afford to be with out it. :( as far as I am concerned one complaint should warrant a recall. Lives are at stake.

- New York 11768, NY, USA

problem #9

Oct 282010

Taurus 6-cyl

  • 77,387 miles
Brake line burst. Control became nonexistent. Got very lucky bringing it home, although I did run into the back of my garage (because the brakes didn't work).

- King Of Prussia, PA, USA

problem #8

Nov 282009

Taurus

  • 112,000 miles
1997 Ford Taurus (1996-2005+) brake line failure. The brake lines to the rear of the car have a corrosion problem under the drivers seat, under the car. The lines corrode severely and then burst under pressure. All braking is lost after the fluid leaks out. Steel lines were not protected from moisture and have plastic shield that traps water.

- Downers Grove, IL, USA

problem #7

Apr 072009

Taurus

  • 120,000 miles
Complete and sudden brake failure. Placed foot on brake pedal to reverse car out of parking spot. (would have caused severe injury/damage had I been at highway speed or city maneuvering). Pedal went to floor and brake fluid puddled under the car. Had car towed to repair facility and brake lines were repaired. Mechanic said Ford's plastic bracket allowed water/dirt/salt to accumulate and rust through lines.

- Merrimack, NH, USA

problem #6

Feb 072009

Taurus

  • 89,700 miles
While driving for a fuel fill-up on a heavily-traveled allegheny co (pa) four-lane road (speed approx. 30-35 mph), traffic heavy, I experienced, without prior warning, a sudden total loss of all braking effectiveness. I followed a Ford F-250 pickup into the gas station lot and brought my car (1997 Ford Taurus sdn, 90,000 miles on odometer) to a stop by smashing into the back of the truck. No one was injured. There was extensive damage to the front end of my car; inconsequential damage to the heavy-duty steel rear bumper of the truck. A sizable puddle of brake fluid was observed forming under driver's side fr door of my car, caused by sudden catastrophic rupture of one or more hydraulic brake lines on my car, resulting in total loss of all braking power. My car is now under repair to replace all rusted-out or corrosion-compromised brake system components. What if, instead of 5:15 pm on a Saturday, this catastrophic loss of brakes had occurred at 3:15 pm on a school day, with a school bus in front of me disgorging half a bus load of school kids crossing the street in front of me" believe me, the flashing red lights of the school bus would not have caused my car to stop. In over 50 yrs of driving, this is the first time I ever experienced a brake line failure, and I routinely drive a car for 10+ yrs. Have the auto mfgrs been permitted to squeeze a few more pennies of profit by adopting a cheaper, less corrosion-resistant grade of steel for the vehicle brake lines? is not the braking system of my '97 supposed to have a redundancy feature to retain some braking effectiveness in the event of loss of one of the lines" the manager of the repair shop where I took the car tells me that brake line replacement has become an increasingly common repair in this part of the snow-and-salt winter driving belt.

- Pittsburgh, PA, USA

problem #5

Mar 072008

Taurus 6-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 123,100 miles
The contact owns a 1997 Ford Taurus. The contact noticed a strong gasoline smell and noticed gasoline on the ground under the vehicle. The mechanic stated that three failures were present: The fuel tank, a coolant leak, and brake line corrosion. There were no warning indicators prior to the failures. The vehicle was repaired. The contact would like Ford to reimburse him for the cost of the repairs, but they refused. The failure mileage was 123,100 and current mileage was 123,900. Updated 04/02/08.

- Dover, NH, USA

problem #4

Jul 152004

Taurus 6-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 78,000 miles
The car was parked. I started the car, stepped on the brakes and it went to the floor. I looked under the car and saw oil leaking about a foot forward of the drivers side rear tire.

- Norwell, MA, USA

problem #3

Mar 152002

Taurus

  • Automatic transmission
  • 7,200 miles
Cracked forward piston in trans. I have a`97, ,,wasn`T that problem fixed?

- Pittsburgh, PA, USA

problem #2

Aug 152003

Taurus

  • Automatic transmission
  • 63,941 miles
Service engine light will not turn off...transmission has been replaced and repaired and is now needing repair again...tires from normal wear...brakes from normal wear...

- Elyria, OH, USA

problem #1

Jul 112003

(reported on)

Taurus 6-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 58,000 miles
The vehicle experienced grinding noise on the rear passenger side. The brake rotors could not be resurfaced because they were too thin. The consumer felt that the elimination of the warning indicator on the rear brake pads could pose a hazard because sudden brake failure could occur without warning.

- North Brunswick, NJ, USA