4.8

definitely annoying
Crashes / Fires:
0 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
0 / 0
Average Mileage:
21,484 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

The NHTSA is the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints can be spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem. See the Back button — blue bar at the very top of the page — to explore more.

Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK230:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

problem #4

Apr 272007

SLK230 6-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 3,000 miles
The contact owns a 2000 Mercedes Benz SL340. The contact stated that several attempts were made to repair the tail lights due to recall # 2006-080005. However, the failure continued to occur. The dealer stated that the parts needed for the repair would not be available for four months. The contact called the dealer and manufacturer to follow-up on the failures, but neither have provided a response. The tail light bulbs burned out two days after the vehicle's most recent repair was completed. The current mileage is 72,500, and failure mileage was 3,000.

- Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

problem #3

Aug 192005

SLK230 4-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 13,900 miles
2000 Mercedes Benz slk 230 with 14072 miles only had tail lamp unit R/side replaced due to the bulb "melting". entire assembly needed to be replaced. Unsafe, defective design for bulb to melt in socket. Problem defined at authorized repair shop as cause: Poor fit. I have spoken with mechanics at shop who stated this is common. Why? needs to be a recall on this before there is a fire in vehicle due to this bulb problem.

- Chicago, IL, USA

problem #2

Aug 042005

SLK230 4-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 40,400 miles
My left rear taillight assembly required replacement following the light failure. The dealer kept the assembly. I paid $180.51.

- Jacksonville , FL, USA

problem #1

Aug 162004

SLK230 4-cyl

  • Automatic transmission
  • 28,635 miles
We own a 2000 Mercedes slk 230. The light, that warns of a lamp failure somewhere on the vehicle, kept coming on. It would not stay on all the time however, and we could not find which lamp was malfunctioning. We called the dealer, Mercedes-Benz of wilsonville, (wilsonville Oregon - 503-454-5000) and were told to bring the vehicle in when the warning lamp came on and stayed on. When it finally did, a couple of months later, we took the vehicle in to the dealer. The service was performed on August 16th 2004. The service department inspected the vehicle and told us that the tail lamp bulbs in both tail lamps were arching and had melted the tail lamp assembly. Both tail lamp assemblies had to be replaced at a cost of $360. The service invoice states "28636 bulb failure mil 852 inspected bulb found evidence of arching between socket and assembly 852 R/R both tail lamp assemblys/82-2310. I spoke with the service advisor, alex garcia. He told me that they had seen this same problem on other Mercedes vehicles. I asked him if a recall had been initiated because it seemed to me that this was a condition that could cause a fire in the rear of the vehicle, near the gas tank. He told me that no recall had been issued. I requested the old parts and was assured by Mr. Garcia that I could have them. He told me he would leave them with the sales department so that I could pick them up that weekend. However when I called the dealership on Saturday the 21st the parts were not there. I will call the dealership on Monday and hope to have the parts returned to me. I believe that this condition is a fire hazard and should be corrected. I suspect that failures in other vehicles were covered by warranty and thus not reported. Nonetheless I believe it should be noted.

- Beaverton, OR, USA