really awful
Crashes / Fires:
1 / 0
Injuries / Deaths:
2 / 0
Average Mileage:
107,989 miles

About These NHTSA Complaints:

The NHTSA is the US gov't agency tasked with vehicle safety. Complaints can be spread across multiple & redundant categories, & are not organized by problem. See the Back button — blue bar at the very top of the page — to explore more.

Get notified about new defects, investigations, recalls & lawsuits for the 2002 Toyota Tundra:

Unsubscribe any time. We don't sell/share your email.

problem #33

Apr 022012


  • 133,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. While driving at an undisclosed speed, there was a loud noise coming from the rear of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic to be diagnosed. The contact was informed that the driver's side rear shock tower was rusted and fractured, which caused the strut housing to fail. Boch Toyota (277 providence hwy, norwood, MA 02062, (781) 769-8100) was contacted to purchase the shock support. The contact was informed that the shock support was part of the subframe and could not be purchased separately. In April of 2012, the vehicle was repaired per NHTSA campaign number: 09V444000 (structure); however, the remedy failed to repair the vehicle. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was not contacted. The approximate failure mileage was 133,000.

- Walpole, MA, USA

problem #32

Jul 252017


  • 136,078 miles
My Tundra was recently diagnosed with critical frame damage that will not pass pa. State inspection. The vehicle was serviced by Toyota for most of it, S life and all frame recalls were completed. The truck has 136,078 miles and is in very good condition. My recent claim with Toyota was rejected based on the their interruptation that all required recalls were done and there is nothing Toyota can due for me. There are numerous problems with Toyota response. The first beginning that when I picked the truck up after the frame recall treatment I asked the tech how the frame looked, he said good but there is a separation starting at the driver side rear leaf spring. That is exactly where my problem lies today. I believe Toyota covered up the problem by treating the frames rather then replacing them in an attempt to save money. How many vehicles covered under this warranty were treated in the same manner and are still currently driving on the roads today? how many of the recalled vehicles now pose a problem to all motorist. Please look into this

- Cheltenham, PA, USA

problem #31

Mar 292017


  • 129,788 miles
Vehicle was recalled for frame rust. It was recorded in 2012 that the frame was coated with crc to prevent /stop the rust. Had it inspected by the dealer and found the frame had rusted around the rear leaf spring and was recommended that I should not drive the vehicle in with this problem. Toyota cannot verify how long this crc coating would last. Is this a just a fix to show that Toyota has fulfilled its obligation as required by NHTSA?

- Easton, PA, USA

problem #30

Nov 232016


  • miles
Had to replace all 4 oxygen sensors. The front two were faulty before 50000 miles and less than 7 years old. The rear differential cover is rotting and leaking fluid. The only way to repair it is to weld over the hole.

- Trumbull, CT, USA

problem #29

Sep 202015


  • 149,000 miles
Frist time comeing down my road going 30 miles per hr L right upper and lower ball joint broke tire went under the truck. Second time the left upper and lower ball joint broke turning a corner. Third time it happen I just got off of the hwy and the lower ball joint broke. I am afied to drive it.

- Newberry Spring, CA, USA

problem #28

Aug 062015


  • miles
I had the frame rust under coating 'band aid' applied to my 2002 Toyota Tundra by a Toyota dealer in lynchburg va in 2011. The frame rust has reappeared so I took it back to the dealer asking for a new band aid to fix this problem and was told there was no warranty on the first fix and Toyota will do nothing. I feel like it is Toyota's responceability to repair or fix the underbody rust problem because they knew about this and are trying not to fulfill their obligation under the rust recall agreemeent with the court.

- Bedford, VA, USA

problem #27

Jul 102015


  • 174,612 miles
Took the truck in for recall inspection of rear as per recall notice #bxd ssc. Was told by sunnyside Toyota that the rear part was fine but the other part of frame is badly corroded. They/and the Toyota manufacturer said that this portion of frame is not covered under recall. Estimate of repair cost $15,000. Remarks on vehicle inspection report: 99 front section of frame has a large hole that we feel is getting to the point of being dangerous/not part of bxd campaign

- Olmsted Falls, OH, USA

problem #26

Jun 012015


  • 106,000 miles
Holes rusted through frame

- Delaware, OH, USA

problem #25

Oct 152014

Tundra 6-cyl

  • 153,340 miles
While traveling on a city road at about 25 mph, the right front wheel came off. I was towed to my mechanic for repair. Both the tow driver and my mechanic told me they had seen this previously in Toyota Tundra's. I later found that there was a recall (ssc 50 J) and, after email correspondence with Toyota and dealership approval of the workmanship performed by my mechanic, applied for a refund of my expenses. When I was denied the first time, the service manager at hollywood Toyota said that he would resubmit by fax, saying that he saw nothing more that the office could want and that he had submitted the Toyota service order for his inspection of my truck, a service order which the office claimed they did not have. The claim was denied again, this time because I had no records of maintenance on or inspection of the faulty ball joints. (there is no way to maintain the ball joints, and there is no way to inspect them, as they are inside a rubber boot.) the denial also stated that my mechanic's invoice was missing detail, although did not state what detail was missing, even upon written request. Hollywood Toyota's service manager said the detail on my invoice was greater than Toyota itself provides and called someone up the line to find out what the issue was. He called more than once. No response. And, when there was no answer after two weeks, called again. Nothing. Note: If there is a way to attach, I would like to attach the full complaint I have written up and will be mailing to your offices.

- Los Angeles, CA, USA

problem #24

Apr 202015

Tundra 6-cyl

  • 158,000 miles
I would like to report an unsafe condition discovered on my 2002 Tundra. With 158000 it was discovered that the front half of the frame has rotted out/ several large perforations make the vehicle unsafe to drive. This is even though the vehicle had gone through a previous recall campaign in which the frame was inspected and rust inhibitor applied to rear of frame.

- South Grafton , MA, USA

problem #23

Nov 012012


  • 80,000 miles
I have a 2002 Toyota Tundra that I bought from del Toyota in thorndale pa. I bought this truck new from this dealer. Toyota sent me a letter for the recall of the frame. I took my truck to del Toyota to have the frame looked at in 2012 and they said the frame just needed sprayed. I was fine with that. The problem is now my frame has 4 inch holes in it up by the engine on both sides. There is not whey my frame would have rusted out that fast since the dealer looked at it in 2012. So I took my Tundra back to the dealer to have them inspect the holes and they told me they would call Toyota to get a new frame on it because I had the truck in during the recall period the first time. Little did I know Toyota said they will not replace my frame because the recall period is over. Then del Toyota told me to call Toyota Corp and talk to a case manager. So I called Toyota Corp and talked to [xxx] (the case manager) and she told me Toyota would not replace the frame because the recall period is over. I told her my truck was in for the recall and they sprayed it when the frame should have been replaced. She told me again Toyota will not replace my frame. So now I am stuck with a unsafe vehicle that I feel unsafe driving and will not pass inspection anymore. Information redacted pursuant to the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).

- Elverson, PA, USA

problem #22

Sep 252014

Tundra 4WD 8-cyl

  • 140,784 miles
I recently took my 2002 Toyota Tundra to the ralph hayes Toyota dealership in anderson, SC for a repair on the power steering system. While I was there, I was notified that my truck was on recall due to corrosion of the frame. I was told that due to the recall I will be given a rental car, at no cost to me, while my truck was to have the frame inspected and repaired. I agreed to the inspection and was given a rental for the time my truck was at the shop. I received a call on 9/25/14 from the Toyota dealership and was presented with 3 options. My first option was to have the new frame installed at no cost however, if any extra parts attached to the frame need to be replaced I was to go ahead and replace them. I was then presented with the price of around $9,500 that I was going to have to pay if I chose this option. My second option was to have the new frame installed at no cost and attempt to install my current parts onto the new frame. The Toyota representative expressed with the current condition of those parts I will need to have them replaced with the cost still at $9,500. My third option was to decline the recall and drive the truck as is with the truck deemed unsafe to drive by the Toyota dealership. The time frame I was given to make a decision was short of nothing. I had to make a decision by the end of the phone call that meant spending $9,500 or drive with an unsafe vehicle that at any given moment could cause a serious or fatal accident. I was forced into declining the recall because I do not have $9,500 in my bank account. Also, after I concluded my business with the dealership, I proceeded to ask them what the trade in value on my truck was to see if buying another vehicle was an option. Their response was $500 due to the recalled frame thus trading in and purchasing a new vehicle is not a viable option. Would you mind reviewing my case?

- Starr, SC, USA

problem #21

Jun 212014

Tundra 8-cyl

  • 230,000 miles
I was driving on the interstate at 70 mph when the lower control arm came apart from my ball joint on the driver side. My wife and I spun uncontrollably with sparks shooting everywhere. We were able to come to a stop once the vehicle dug itself into the dirt of the median. It was such an embarrassment for myself as I have held the name "Toyota" to the highest standard before all other auto maker. After the incident, I am now doing research and there had been a similar recall in 2005. I moved to a different state during this time and did not receive or know of a recall notice. I service all of my vehicles myself and very seldom take them into the dealership.

- Ratcliff, AR, USA

problem #20

Jul 102014


  • 118,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated while driving approximately 65 mph, the front driver's side strut sheared off. The vehicle was taken to an independent mechanic. The manufacturer had not been made aware of the problem. The VIN was not available.the approximate mileage at the time of failure was 118,000.

- San Diago, CA, USA

problem #19

Apr 252014


  • 53,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while driving 5 mph, the vehicle suddenly dropped to the ground. The vehicle was towed to dealer where it was stated that the lower ball joint was fractured and the cv joint was damaged. The manufacturer was alerted of the failure and stated that the contact's VIN was not included in NHTSA campaign number: 05V225000 (suspension). The driver and passenger suffered mild back pain from the incident. The vehicle was repaired. The failure mileage was 53,000.

- Cottage Grove, MN, USA

problem #18

Nov 102013


  • 135,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while driving approximately 15 mph, the front driver's side of the vehicle leaned over the front driver's side tire. The vehicle was towed to the contacts residence, where the contact inspected the vehicle and noticed that the front driver's side lower ball joint nut was sheered. The vehicle was repaired. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The vehicle was previously included in and repaired under NHTSA campaign number: 05V225000 (suspension). The approximate failure mileage was 135,000.

- Clyde, NC, USA

problem #17

Sep 282013


  • 250,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while driving various speeds, the front passenger's side tire became detached unexpectedly from the vehicle. There was a loss of steering control and the vehicle began to skid 35-40 feet before proceeding to stop. The vehicle then collapsed to the ground. The vehicle was towed to an independent mechanic and an authorized dealer, in which both informed the contact that the brake lines and the frame was corroded. In addition, the front passenger's side ball joint was defective. The contact referenced NHTSA campaign id numbers: 09V444000 (structure) and 05V225000 (suspension) however, the vehicle was not included in either. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The approximate failure mileage was 250,000. The VIN was unavailable.

- Monroe, CT, USA

problem #16

Aug 072013


  • 170,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that while driving 65 mph, a loud noise dragging noise was heard. After inspecting the vehicle, the contact noticed that the fuel tank was dragging on the ground. The vehicle was towed to a dealer and diagnosed that the universal joint had become fractured and as result, the drive shaft and fuel tank were dropped. The contact decided to take the vehicle to a second dealer for and the technician stated that the frame was cracked. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure and current mileage was 170,000.

- Bridgeport , NY, USA

problem #15

Dec 172012

Tundra 8-cyl

  • 72,500 miles
Vehicle inspected by dealer leak in rack and pinion. Very early at 72,500 miles. Loose lower ball joints. Lower ball joints replaced under recall 10/11/2005 at 28,000 miles. If they are going bad again at 72,500 miles, there is a major problem.

- Gasport, NY, USA

problem #14

Mar 062012

Tundra 6-cyl

  • Manual transmission
  • 74,000 miles
The contact owns a 2002 Toyota Tundra. The contact stated that the vehicle was taken to an authorized dealer for a repair associated with NHTSA campaign id number 09V444000 (structure: Frame and members: Underbody shields). While the technician performed the repair, he noticed both stabilizer links and the parking brake rear wheel mechanism were fractured as a result of excessive rust corrosion. In addition, the rack and pinion was corroded. The vehicle had not been repaired. The manufacturer was not notified of the problem. The approximate failure mileage was 74,000. Updated 4/3/12 the consumer stated the front stabilizer links broke off, due to them being rusted. The driver side emergency brake seized. The steering shaft U-joint was badly rusted. Updated 05/17/12

- Reynoldsburg, OH, USA

Read the next 13 complaints »